Communication in Damage Control Resuscitation and Damage Control Surgery

Warning

Objectives

  • To outline the recommended framework for communication during deployed DCR-DCS episodes.  
  • To reduce the cognitive burden on deployed clinicians through the employment of this framework for briefings and trauma team updates, thus enabling greater focus on clinical tasks.
  • To provide a format where information can be shared and extracted, to support wider Command and logistical considerations. 

Scope

This guideline applies to communication during the management of complex injured patients in the Role 2 and Role 3 deployed environments. Preoperative components are centred on the initial reception of casualties to a surgical facility. Other aspects of the preparation for and management of casualties are not covered. 

Audience

All clinicians within the deployed setting delivering trauma care at Role 2 and Role 3. 

Initial Assessment & Management

Basic Communication Tools during DCR/DCS

ATMIST:

Age 
Time since injury 
Mechanism 
Injuries 
Symptoms and Signs 
Treatment Given 

TSTACKP

Time from knife to skin (KTS) 
Systolic blood pressure 
Temperature 
Acidosis 
Clotting (ROTEM result if available), blood products transfused 
Kit available/ unavailable, limits of surgery, consideration of futility 
Plan and Progress 

Key Communication Points in DCR/DCS 

The identification and management of haemorrhagic shock is one of the principal challenges in DCR-DCS. The use of ambiguous terminology, especially the term “stable” should be avoided. 
Haemodynamic status can be described well with these terms: 

  • Shock state:
    • Overt shock – patients with low blood pressure
    • Occult shock – patients with evidence of shock but preserved blood pressure. Tachycardia, narrowed pulse pressure, raised lactate.
    • Isolated findings – e.g. modest tachycardia
    • Normal haemodynamics 
  • Treatment response:
    • Non-responder – minimal response to fluid therapy
    • Transient response – a short-liver response to fluid therapy
    • Transfusion dependent – response is maintained by ongoing resuscitation. This is a form of transient response
    • Sustained response – response to treatment that is maintained without significant further transfusion. 

Initial Assessment & Management

Before arrival (links to existing Role 2/3 preparation for casualty receiving team) 
The aim of the initial brief is to establish a shared mental model within the team of the expected situation and how the team will respond, including individual roles. 

Led by the TTL: 

  • Introductions
  • What we know
    • ATMIST
    • Tactical context (including operational tempo, facility status, evacuation considerations and implications for futility thresholds)
    • Equipment status
    • Blood product status  
  • What we expect
  • What might change
  • Assign specific roles
  • Suggestions/ concerns 

On Arrival of Casualty 

  1. Immediate life-saving interventions.
  2. ATMIST handover from transferring clinician.  
  3. Primary survey.
  4. Initial interventions.
  5. Surgical assessment if required.
  6. Secondary survey if appropriate  
  7. Re-establish shared mental model:  
    • TTL-led 
    • All involved
    • Futility considered
    • Plan proposed
    • ATMIST and TSTACKP readied  

Command Huddle

The Command Huddle allows decisions about patient disposal to be made in a coordinated way in the light of the needs of others and the disposition of the facility.  

Members:

  • Trauma Team Leader (TTL) – usually EM Consultant
  • Consultant General/ Vascular Surgeon
  • Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon
  • Consultant Anaesthetists
  • Deployed Medical Director/ Clinical Lead 

Where there are multiple casualties, the DMD or clinician overseeing the incident response should determine what representation is needed for each patient while ensuring adequate specialty participation. 

The Command Huddle should consider:

  • ATMIST and TSTACKP for each patient being considered
  • Status of other patients
  • Capacity of departments
  • Blood products and other resources
  • Tactical considerations:
    • Anticipated and potential casualties
    • Evacuation options
    • Fixation of facility by embarking on surgery

The Command Huddle will then determine disposal:

  • Surgery
  • Imaging
  • Non-operative management, serial observation [see SNOM CGO]
  • REBOA if surgery delayed [see REBOA CGO]
  • Ward – level 1, 2 or 3
  • Transfer
  • If futile, withdrawal in most appropriate location. 

Communicate decisions to all affected teams  

Snap Brief – On Transfer to Theatre

In an MTF, the TTL will usually oversee the transfer to theatre and participate in the Snap Brief. If this is not the case, there must be a clear and formal handover of the patient to the anaesthetic team before transfer. 

Condensed pre-operative checklist based on WHO checklist, focused on physiological and surgical considerations:

  • Surgeon
    • Confirms correct patient and ID
    • Clinical & radiological findings& imaging
    • Suspected injuries
    • Surgical plan
  • Anaesthetist
    • Systolic blood pressure
    • Temperature
    • Acidosis
    • Clotting (ROTEM result if available), blood products transfused
    • Kit available/ unavailable, limits of surgery, consideration of futility
    • Plan and progress
    • Antibiotics and TXA given
    • Blood products available
    • Major safety issues discussed
    • Start time recorded 

Sit Reps 

Sit Reps should occur every 10 minutes during the early and most active parts of DCS. 
Sit Reps should usually be anaesthetist lead using TSTACKP model. 
 
Additional Sit Reps may be required:

  • Before or after critical manoeuvres, such as opening a cavity, (un)packing, (un)clamping, release of tourniquets etc.
  • In the event of an unexpected intra-operative crisis – please see Crisis Containment Model in Accordion Content 

Surgeon and anaesthetist may decide to reduce the frequency of Sit Reps once the physiology, bleeding and contamination are brought under control. 

Communication of Crucial Intraoperative Events 

Outside of a Sit Rep, there may be physiological or anatomical events that need to be communicated to team members at a time when individuals have limited bandwidth. The information holder should follow the following cycle: 

  • Name audience for the information
  • Check audience is attending
  • Convey information
  • Check understanding 

Usually, such information will be best communicated to all. The secondary surgeon/anaesthetist etc will be an important adjunct to communication with the primary.

Sign Out and De-brief – on completion of surgery

1. Team sign-off at completion of surgery to deliver whole-team update of interventions and postoperative care plan. 

  • Surgeon
    • Injuries identified and physiology
    • Surgical findings and interventions
    • What has been treated, temporised or left untreated
    • Ongoing plan - need for return to theatre, if so timeline
    • Number of packs retained
  • Anaesthetist
    • TSTACKP
    • Plan for ongoing treatments and support
  • Both
    • Plan for antibiotics, VTE prophylaxis, nutrition, other interventions/ therapies
    • Hold or evacuate patient

2. Team de-brief immediately following sign-out, using STOP (or similar framework):

  • Summarise
  • Things that went well
  • Opportunities to improve
  • Points to action and responsibilities

3. Plan for resetting and restocking of facility 

Documentation after surgery 
 
Operation notes should contain the following information:

  • Patient demographics
  • Responsible consultants
  • Anaesthetists and operating surgeons
  • Indication(s)
  • Operation(s) performed
  • Separately documented operations performed on the patient during the same theatre session should be acknowledged.
  • Incision(s)
  • Findings
  • Procedure
  • Closure
  • Post-op instructions. Recommended format: OIL PIT TINDR (WARS)

OIL – items required in the post-op period

  • Observations
  • Investigations
  • Laboratory Tests  

PIT – items to be prescribed

  • Pain relief
  • Infection Prophylaxis and Treatment
  • Thromboprophylaxis 

TINDR – Plans for post-op care +/- re-operation

  • Tubes
  • Incision
  • Nutrition
  • Disposal
  • Retained Swabs 

WARS – For extremity, spine and pelvis cases. Mobilisation guidance should be substituted in other cases.

  • Weight Bearing
  • Activity Level
  • Range of motion
  • Splintage 

Prolonged Casualty Care

This framework can be applied to both receiving casualties having undergone prolonged casualty care, and where there may be a prolonged hold at the Role 2/3 facility once DCR-DCS has been performed.  Additional considerations for the care of these patients should be highlighted at the ‘Command Huddle’ and/or the ‘Sign out’, as appropriate.  

Paediatric Considerations

This framework can be applied to the care of paediatric patients. 

Last reviewed: 25/08/2026

Next review date: 25/08/2027

References

1. Mercer S, Arul GS, Pugh HE. Performance improvement through best practice team management: human factors in complex trauma. J R Army Med Corps. 2014;160(2):105-8.

2. Arul GS, Pugh HE, Mercer SJ, Midwinter MJ. Human factors in decision making in major trauma in Camp Bastion, Afghanistan. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97(4):262-8.

3. Arul GS, Pugh H, Kluth MJ, Bromiley M. Common goals, shared risk and a just culture: human factors lessons from the front line. J R Soc Med. 2017;110(3):93-7.

4. Iattoni M, Ormazabal M, Luvini G, Uccella L. Effect of Structured Briefing Prior to Patient Arrival on Interprofessional Communication and Collaboration in the Trauma Team. Open Access Emerg Med. 2022;14:385-93.

5. Mercer S, Park C, Tarmey NT. Human factors in complex trauma. BJA Education. 2015;15(5):231-6.

6. Alexandrino H, Martinho B, Ferreira L, Baptista S. Non-technical skills and teamwork in trauma: from the emergency department to the operating room. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1319990.

7. Fadden S, Mercer SJ. Followership in complex trauma. Trauma. 2018;21(1):6-13.

8. Hargestam M, Lindkvist M, Brulin C, Jacobsson M, Hultin M. Communication in interdisciplinary teams: exploring closed-loop communication during in situ trauma team training. BMJ Open. 2013;3(10):e003525.

9. Patton EN, Lisagors I, Tyrrell-Marsh I, Agarwal S, Wee LV, Darwish A, et al. Improving communication during damage control surgery: a survey of adult major trauma centres in England. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024.

10. Mercer SJ, Khan MA, Scott T, Matthews JJ, Henning D, Stapley S. Human factors in contingency operations. J R Army Med Corps. 2017;163(2):78-83.