Immediate Management of the Septic Patient

Warning

Objectives

To guide the immediate management of patients with sepsis.

Scope

The guideline describes the management of patients with sepsis in a forward medical context or deployed emergency department.

There is additional guidance within the accordion section regarding the ‘immediate management of neutropenic sepsis’.

Audience

This guideline is intended for registered healthcare professionals fulfilling a general role in forward medical locations or an emergency department during deployed operations.

Initial Assessment & Management

Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection.

Septic shock is a subset of sepsis, which describes circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities that are associated with a greater risk of mortality than sepsis alone.

Recognition:

Clinicians should suspect a diagnosis of sepsis in any person with risk factors for sepsis (see accordion content), who present with the following features: 

  • Confirmed infection or symptoms/signs indicating a possible infection.
  • NEWS2 Score of 5 or above (see accordion content).
  • Recent chemotherapy or immunotherapy.
  • Lactate of 2mmol/L or above.
  • Assessment giving clinical cause for concern -  this may be non specific and non localised, including general malaise, agitation, confusion or behavioural change

Management:

Overall management should follow a systematic, structured (MARCH) approach.

Early administration of IV Broad Spectrum Antibiotics (In accordance with current deployed antimicrobial guidance) is lifesaving and should not be delayed by any investigation or casualty transfer.

Airway:

  • Patients with sepsis will benefit from early optimal airway management with meticulous detail, particularly those with a reduced GCS.
  • Interventions, if appropriate, will range from simple airway manoeuvres to adjuncts including NPA, OPA, and i-Gel.
  • Prolonged requirement for airway support despite resuscitation should prompt early escalation for critical care support and early evacuation to a higher level of care.

Respiration:

  • Clinically shocked or unconscious patients should immediately receive high-flow oxygen at 15l/min via NRB facemask if available.
  • All other patients with Sepsis will require supplemental oxygen if SpO2 <92%, aiming for 94-98% saturations.
  • Escalating oxygen requirement or prolonged need for high flow oxygen should prompt early escalation for critical care support and early evacuation to a higher level of care.

Circulation:

  • Early IV or IO access is essential in the management of sepsis to facilitate blood sampling and drug administration. 
  • As above once IV/IO access has been gained IV antibiotics should be given in line with current deployed antimicrobial guidance. If equipped then take blood cultures before administering antibiotics - but do not delay antibiotic therapy.
  • Maintaining adequate circulatory function is a key priority to restore and optimise tissue perfusion initially via early and effective hypovolaemic shock management. 
  • If the casualty is showing signs of clinical shock (systolic BP <90mmHg, tachycardia, altered mental state, prolonged capillary refill time or if available, lactate >2mmol/l), 500ml crystalloid fluid should be administered as quickly as possible.
  • Casualties should receive up to 20ml/kg of crystalloid fluid within the first hour of treatment to achieve the advised haemodynamic targets:
    • Systolic BP >90 mmHg.
    • Normal conscious level.
    • Respiratory rate <25 breaths per minute.
    • Lactate <2mmol/l (If able to measure)
  • Initiate urine output and fluid balance monitoring. 
  • Persistent clinical shock despite fluid resuscitation should prompt early escalation for critical care support and early evacuation to a higher level of care.

Hypothermia/Head injury:

  • Check blood sugar and treat hypoglycaemia if present.
  • Persistently low GCS despite resuscitation should prompt early escalation for critical care support and early evacuation to a higher level of care.
  • Do not rely solely on pyrexia for diagnosis of sepsis, normal temperatures and hypothermia may exist and may be associated with increased mortality.
  • Ensure full top to toe examination is completed for sources of infection and signs of peripheral perfusion.

Advanced Assessment & Management

Assessment:

Regular re-assessment and monitoring of the patient with sepsis should be continued throughout the patient care pathway looking for the degree systemic impact and organ injury.

Alongside degree of severity, assessment should focus on the identification of the source of sepsis to allow specific treatment options to be considered.

Once capable blood should be taken to check as a minimum blood gas (including lactate) full blood count, U&Es, CRP, and clotting. Further blood tests should be taken as able and required to distinguish source of sepsis and degree of systemic response.

Should a patient be identified as neutropenic (neutrophil count of 0.5 x 109/l or less), this should be treated a neutropenic sepsis (see accordion content below).

If possible cultures should be taken to identify the pathogen involved. These may include blood, urine, sputum, wounds amongst others.

Imaging should be used to support diagnosis and source of sepsis as well as the degree of systematic response (e.g. CXR for pneumonia and ARDS, Ultrasound for biliary/renal pathology and echo for cardiac function).

Management:

Airway:

  • Intubation (via PHEA or in hospital RSI) may be required in line with standard indications to secure the airway, facilitate ventilation and manage patients with low GCS or agitation.

Breathing:

  • Casualties may require ventilatory support, particularly in cases of acute respiratory failure, neurological deterioration, ARDS or a lack of response to conventional oxygen therapy.
  • If mechanically ventilated, a lower tidal volume of 6ml/kg is advised alongside other lung protective measures, such as limiting peak airway pressures to 30cm H2O and increased PEEP. Further detail can be found in the critical care guideline Invasive Mechanical Ventilation 

Circulation:

  • If a casualty has a continued state of tissue hypoperfusion despite 20ml/kg of fluid resuscitation, they may require the introduction of vasoactive medications, aiming for a MAP of 65mmHg.
  • Invasive blood pressure monitoring should be considered concurrently, as it allows for continuous monitoring, early detection of deterioration, and increased accuracy of targeted management.
  • The choice of vasoactive medication will depend on clinical capabilities, availability in deployed modules and routes of IV access. Further detail can be found in the critical care guidelines for circulatory support (link to follow)
  • Invasive urine output monitoring via a urinary catheter is recommended along with diligent fluid balance monitoring. 

Antimicrobials:

  • Broad spectrum IV antibiotics should be continued initially in accordance with current deployed antimicrobial guidance.
  • If a source is identified consideration should be given to narrowing the spectrum of antimicrobials.

Prolonged Casualty Care

The HITMAN mnemonic should guide ongoing management in the prolonged casualty care phase.

Further considerations are as follows:

Oxygenation:

  • Prolonged casualty care on oxygen will place a significant demand on supply.
  • Cautious SpO2 monitoring, aiming for 94-98%, will optimise both oxygen delivery to tissues and limit resource exhaustion.

Fluid Management:

  • Casualties with sepsis are prone to extracellular fluid shift and insensible losses. Fluid resuscitation should therefore be performed judiciously to avoid pushing the patient into overload.
  • Close monitoring of urine output, aiming for a minimum of 0.5ml/kg/hr, is essential in guiding further fluid challenges; catheters should be avoided in ambulatory patients and urine output instead measured non-invasively.
  • The ambulatory/conscious patient should be encouraged to drink water +/- rehydration solution to reduce reliance on limited stocks of IV fluid. 

Antimicrobials:

  • Responsible antibiotic stewardship should be considered including reviewing the decision to keep the casualty on IV antibiotics at 24, 48 and 72 hours.
  • With clinical improvement consider a switch to oral antibiotics in accordance with current deployed antimicrobial guidance.
  • It is important to remember that not all sepsis is caused by bacteria; a failure to respond to treatment should alert the clinician to the need to escalate the spectrum of antibiotic coverage or to consider fungal or atypical bacterial causes. 

Paediatric Considerations

Sepsis is a major cause of death in the under-five population worldwide. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion in children and a low threshold for escalation of treatment. 

Although age based sepsis risk stratification tools are available to support diagnosis, in the operational environment attempting to differentiate between amber (moderately unwell) and red (severely unwell) is not considered to be helpful:

In the operational environment any child with moderate or high risk features (listed as red flags in the accordion content below) should be managed as severely unwell.

Screening should take place for all infants and children who look unwell or are feverish:

  • <3 months with temperature > 38C
  • >3 months with temperature >39C

Children often compensate well during a disease process like sepsis. Identification of subtle changes in physiology can be highlighted using the Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) with an appropriate escalation plan.

General measures:

  • Do not routinely use NSAIDs as an antipyretic.
  • IV/IO Antimicrobials should be administered via weight based dosing in accordance with current deployed antimicrobial guidance.
  • Fluid resuscitation with 5ml/kg IV fluid (Crystalloid) boluses should be given initially.
  • If there is limited improvement following 40ml/kg of fluid, consider inotropic support.

Risk factors for Sepsis

The very young (<1 year old), older people (>75 years old) and those who are very frail.

People with impaired immune systems:

  • Chemotherapy
  • Co-morbidities – diabetes, splenectomy, sickle cell disease
  • Steroids and long-term immunosuppressant drugs
  • Surgery or invasive procedures in the prior 6 weeks
  • Indwelling lines or catheters
  • Misuse of intravenous drugs
  • Prolonged deployment with poor nutrition and hygiene

Pregnancy, post-partum, miscarriage or termination of pregnancy in the prior 6 weeks

NEWS2 Score

Neutropaenic Sepsis

Recognition:

Clinicians should suspect a diagnosis of neutropenic sepsis in any person with known neutropenia (neutrophil count of 0.5 x 109/l or less) or with risk factors for neutropenia (see below) and/or with risk factors of neutropenic sepsis (see below), who present with the following features:

  • Confirmed infection or symptoms/signs indicating a possible infection
  • Temperature <38C or rigors (this may be the only sign of infection)
  • Clinical features of sepsis: tachycardia, tachypnoea, hypotension, fever/hypothermia, prolonged capillary refill time, mottled skin, newly altered mental status and/or reduced urinary output.

Risk factors for neutropenia:

  • Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
  • Radiotherapy
  • Stem cell transplantation
  • Immunosuppressive drugs such as azathioprine, methotrexate, sulfasalazine or DMARDs.
  • Infections – HIV, Hepatitis A/B/C, Tuberculosis, Malaria.
  • Bone marrow disease or failure – aplastic anaemia, haematological malignancies.
  • Primary or idiopathic neutropenia.

Patient risk factors for the development of neutropenic sepsis:

  • Severe or prolonged neutropenia – absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 109/l or less for more than 7 days. 
  • Age – infants and people over the age of 60 receiving chemotherapy
  • Active chemotherapy
  • Corticosteroid use
  • Haematological malignancy, advanced malignancy
  • Co-morbidities – diabetes mellitus, liver disease, renal disease, poor nutritional status.

Management:
The initial management of neutropenic sepsis remains the same as sepsis. However, IV broad-spectrum antibiotics should be administered in line with current anti-microbial guidelines as the maximum recommended dose, irrespective of expected transfer time.

Isolation:
Isolation precautions should be in place for any patient who is suspected of having neutropenic sepsis. Ideally, these patients should be isolated from other patients; if this is not feasible then the patient should wear personal protective equipment (PPE). Clinical staff should wear standard PPE and adhere to strict handwashing standards.

Paediatrics:
The most common cause of neutropenia in the paediatric population is marrow suppression secondary to chemotherapy, but it can be seen in non-malignant conditions. The initial management of a child with suspected neutropenic sepsis remains the same, irrespective of the cause of neutropenia. 

Sepsis Risk Evaluation - Children Under 5

This is based on NICE Sepsis Risk Evaluation, but in the operational environment, there is no benefit in attempting to differentiate between moderate or high risk - all children with features of concern should be managed as at risk of severe illness.

Criteria Red Flag
Heart rate

>150 if under 1

>140 if 1 or 2

>130 if 3 or 4

<60 in all ages

Respiratory rate

>50 if under 1

>40 if 1 or 2

>35 if 3 or 4

Temperature

>38°C if under 3 months

>39°C if 3-6 months

<36°C in all ages

Respiration and Saturations

<92% in air or new oxygen requirement

Grunting, apnoea or nasal flaring

Behaviour

Decreased activity

Not responding normally to social cues

No smile

Parent, carer or healthcare professional concern

Does not wake, if roused does not stay awake, or wakes only with prolonged stimulation

Weak, high-pitched or continuous cry

Other

Capillary refill >3s

Mottled or ashen appearance

Non-blanching rash

Pallor or cyanosis of skin, lips or tongue

Reduced urine output (<1ml/kg/hr if catheterised)

Leg pain

Cold hands and/or feet

 

Sepsis Risk Evaluation - Children Aged 5-11

This is based on NICE Sepsis Risk Evaluation, but in the operational environment, there is no benefit in attempting to differentiate between moderate or high risk - all children with features of concern should be managed as at risk of severe illness.

Criteria Red Flag
Heart rate

>120 in age 5

>110 in age 6-7

>105 in age 8-11

<60 in any age

Respiratory rate

>24 in 5-7

>22 in 8-11

Temperature <36°C
Saturations <92% in air or new oxygen requirement
Behaviour

Decreased activity/not behaving normally

Parent, carer or healthcare professional concern

Does not wake, or if roused does not stay awake

Other

Capillary refill >3s

Mottled or ashen appearance

Cyanosis of skin, lips or tongue

Reduced urine output (<1ml/kg/hr if catheterised)

Leg pain

Cold hands and/or feet

 

Sepsis Risk Evaluation - Children Aged 12-15

This is based on NICE Sepsis Risk Evaluation, but in the operational environment, there is no benefit in attempting to differentiate between moderate or high risk - all children with features of concern should be managed as at risk of severe illness.

Criteria Red flag
Heart rate >90
Respiratory rate

>20 breaths per minute

New need for oxygen to maintain saturations >92%

Temperature <36°C
Systolic blood pressure <90
Behaviour History or presentation of altered mental state
Other

Mottled or ashen appearance

Cyanosis of skin, lips or tongue

Not passed urine in past 12 hours (or less than 1ml/kg/hr if catheterised)

Impaired immune system

Trauma, surgery or invasive procedure in past 8 weeks with any signs of potential infection (redness, swelling or discharge at surgical site, breakdown of wound) 

New arrhythmia

 

 

Last reviewed: 13/10/2026

Next review date: 13/10/2027